← Back to Knowledge

Since this summer we have been hearing that batteries are already saturated. The price cap came down, and in Kyushu and Chubu clearing prices fell. Count it out and the answer splits in two. The small seat where batteries sit has indeed begun to fill. But even that seat is still half open, and in the building that is Japan's balancing market for ΔkW (EPRX) there are 7 rooms, of which the ones batteries sit in come to under 10% of the whole.

This page counts the supply side: when, where and how much battery capacity arrives. Procurement volume, the size of the room, is on 47-2, and where the price stops is on 47-4.

1. Batteries have 2 kinds of seat

← scroll horizontally →

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 MW (average per 30-min slot, August 2026) Combined (prim.–tert. ①) Tertiary ① Primary online Secondary ① Secondary ② Primary offline frame Tertiary ② Sought 3,783MW 9% Sought 2,963MW Sought 1,508MW 23% Sought 1,181MW Sought 973MW Sought 497MW, 52% open (nobody won it) 48% Sought 484MW Figure 1 Who sits where: the batteries-only frame is half empty, online is mostly thermal Battery awards Thermal award Pumped/hydro/VPP awards Open seats (nobody won) Sought Note: outside the offline frame the same source can bid into several products at once (combined award), so awards can exceed the volume sought. Read the battery share product by product.

The balancing market has 5 products (primary control reserve, secondary control reserve ① and ②, and tertiary control reserve ① and ②), but from a battery's point of view there are 2 kinds of seat.

One is the "primary offline frame." It can be offered without an online link to the transmission and distribution operator (TSO), and 100% of the awarded volume is batteries. It is a small frame of about 500 MW nationwide; in August batteries took 238 MW of it, and the remaining 259 MW (52%) sat as open seats that nobody won. Batteries of 10 MW and above have to connect online (COLUMN 15), so this is mainly a seat for batteries under 10 MW.

The other is the "online seats." Primary online, secondary ①, secondary ② and tertiary ① are procured inside the combined market, which puts primary through tertiary ① out together, and there thermal, pumped storage and batteries compete on the same bids. In this market the same power source can bid into several products at once (combined award), so the bars in Figure 1 add up to more than the physical capacity. The battery share has to be read product by product: 23% in primary online and 9% in the combined product. The rest is thermal and pumped storage, and there are almost no open seats online (6% in primary online). Awards in primary online are 65–72% thermal and 5–13% pumped storage. Thermal, which answers with governor-free (GF) response, is the master of this seat.

Extra-high-voltage batteries (10 MW and above) sit in the latter, the online seats.

2. The small frame has begun to fill — still half open. The online seats are taken, but they change hands

← scroll horizontally →

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Shortfall rate (share of volume sought not awarded) 74% 66% 65% 59% 53% 56% Online side nearly full since June. Even when full, cheap bids get in; seats change Sep is 1–7 Figure 2 The batteries-only frame is still half open; the online seats are full but change hands Primary offline frame (batteries only, ~500MW) Primary online (thermal, pumped, battery share a seat) Combined (primary–tertiary ① together)

Figure 2 is the share of procurement volume that was not awarded, the shortfall rate. It is counted the same way as in COLUMN 16, area by area and slot by slot and then summed. The batteries-only frame (primary offline) went from 74% in April to 53% in August. That runs with the 67.9% for April–June in COLUMN 16, and awarded battery volume grew about 1.8-fold in 4 months. Even so, half of the frame is still open.

The online seats move differently. The shortfall rate for primary online went from 38% in April to 18% in June, and has been around 10% since July. The combined product has been almost zero since June. The seats are filled by thermal, pumped storage and batteries. But they are not seats hard-partitioned by procurement volume. In 30% of slots the awarded volume exceeds the procurement volume, and in August an average of 88 MW in primary online and 262 MW in the combined product was awarded above the procurement volume. Even when the seats are taken, a cheap bid gets in. The online seats are ones to look at not for "are they open" but for "can they be taken over." This is the seat that extra-high-voltage batteries will be moving into. If nuclear restarts stop thermal at night, the thermal share of this seat opens up (→ 47-2).

Looking at total bid volume alone, Tokyo, Chubu and Kyushu have had months above the procurement volume. Seats still count as open when measured by awards because most of the bidding does not reach an award (80–100% of the shortfall in those 3 areas in August). Because the same battery can stack bids across several products (combined award), the total awarded battery volume inside the same 30-minute slot reaches double the connected capacity of 84 × 10,000 kW in some months (a maximum of 1,685 MW in August). Total bid volume looks larger than the volume that can be seated. As in COLUMN 16, we line the counting up on awards.

By area, how full the seats are differs. Here "full" and "open" have to be looked at room by room.

← scroll horizontally →

Hokkaido Tohoku Tokyo Chubu Hokuriku Kansai Chugoku Shikoku Kyushu Combined (primary–tertiary ①, ~3,800MW) Primary online (thermal, pumped, battery, ~1,500MW) Primary offline frame (batteries only, ~500MW) Open Short 83% Half Short 46% Half Short 20% Half Short 39% Open Short 62% Open Short 66% Open Short 82% Open Short 99% Open Short 52% Nearly full Short 1% Half Short 25% Nearly full Short 15% Nearly full Short 11% Half Short 27% Nearly full Short 11% Nearly full Short 0% Nearly full Short 0% Nearly full Short 0% Nearly full Short 5% Nearly full Short 6% Nearly full Short 2% Nearly full Short 9% Nearly full Short 13% Nearly full Short 9% Nearly full Short 5% Nearly full Short 1% Nearly full Short 2% Figure 3 How the 3 seats fill (August 2026; shortfall rate = share of volume sought not awarded; summed by area × slot)

Figure 3 lines up the shortfall rate by area for the 3 seats a battery can enter.

In the primary offline frame at the top, the fullest is Tokyo, with a shortfall rate of 20%. Chubu, Tohoku and Kyushu are 40–50% open, and Kansai, Chugoku and Hokkaido 60–80%. The reason is simple: the batteries that are connected and running are still concentrated in Tokyo, Chubu and Kyushu. The right way to read Hokkaido's openness is not "Hokkaido has seats to spare" but "batteries have barely arrived in Hokkaido yet." Hokkaido's primary offline seat is only 17 MW, and the award is 3 MW.

In primary online in the middle, thermal, pumped storage and batteries compete for the same seat. Hokkaido, Shikoku, Kyushu and Chugoku have shortfall rates of 1% or less, filled by pumped storage and thermal. The feeling that "Hokkaido is filled by pumped storage" is right as a statement about this seat. Tohoku and Hokuriku still have about a quarter open.

The combined product at the bottom is the largest seat, and it is nearly full in every area. Most of what sits there is thermal, and batteries are 9%.

Stack the three together and the open seats for a battery are first in its own frame (60–100% in Kansai, Chugoku, Hokkaido, Hokuriku and Shikoku, and 40–50% in Tohoku, Chubu and Kyushu), and then online in Tohoku and Hokuriku. What is left online is a displacement contest against thermal and pumped storage. The battery share of the combined product rose from 6% in April to 9% in August. The seats have not filled up; they are widening as they fill. That is the shape seen from the supply side.

3. What arrives is a part of what is applied for

← scroll horizontally →

Applications (end-March 2026) Cost-contribution contract (cumulative to end-FY2029, read off chart) In the Supply Plan (developers' own plans, FY2030) Connected (end-March 2026) 3,527 ×10,000kW 1,500 ×10,000kW 631 ×10,000kW 84 ×10,000kW Not all applications arrive; the real number is between the 3 lines below Figure 4 4 layers of battery supply; applications ≠ arrivals

Seeing a figure like "3,500 × 10,000 kW of battery connection applications" makes it look as though all of it will arrive. It will not. The supply side is built in 4 layers.

At the top, contract applications are about 3,527 × 10,000 kW (end of March 2026). Below that, the cumulative volume to the end of FY2029 that has got as far as a construction cost contribution contract is about 1,500 × 10,000 kW. The batteries that developers have entered in the Supply Plan as their own plans are 167 × 10,000 kW in FY2026 and 631 × 10,000 kW in FY2030. At the bottom, what is actually connected and running is 84 × 10,000 kW (end of March 2026).

The gap between applications and connected capacity is 42-fold. That gap is what is called grid-capacity hoarding (speculative applications), and countermeasures began in January 2026: requiring land rights with a connection study application, raising deposits, capping the number of applications per developer, and answering early once it is clear the construction cost will not work. Applications are being narrowed. What actually arrives is somewhere between the bottom 3 lines of Figure 4.

4. Where the high-confidence supply arrives — the Long-term Decarbonization Power Source Auction

Some batteries are all but certain to arrive: those awarded in the Long-term Decarbonization Power Source Auction (LDA). Across 3 rounds, batteries account for 76 projects and 3,713 MW (round 1: 1,092; round 2: 1,370; round 3: 1,251 MW, excluding pumped storage). They are committed to begin supplying by the end of the fiscal year 4 years after contracting, and as of the end of March 2026 no battery has exited.

Location can only be read from the project names in the list of awarded power sources, and many projects in rounds 2 and 3 carry only a company name, so 1,626 MW of the 3,713 MW (44%) is "unknown." Of what can be read, the weight is in the 2 eastern areas — Tohoku 775 MW and Hokkaido 457 MW — with Tokyo at zero. What arrives in those 2 areas heads for Tokyo over the interconnectors in the next section. Read the breakdown by area on the basis that 40% of it is unknown.

5. The size of the vessel, and the volume arriving

FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 ×10,000kW ↓ Primary offline (battery seat) ~50 ×10,000kW Primary+sec.①+combined ~680 ×10,000kW All products ~1,140 ×10,000kW Figure 5 Vessel size vs arrivals; still wide Cost-contribution contract (cum., approx) Batteries in the Supply Plan (2027–29 interpolated) Connected (end-Mar 2026) 84 ×10,000kW

Figure 5 lays the supply-side lines (the Supply Plan and construction cost contribution contracts) over the size of the vessel (procurement volume). The vessel has 3 tiers: the band at the bottom is the battery seat (primary offline, about 50 × 10,000 kW), the dashed line in the middle is about 680 × 10,000 kW for primary, secondary ① and combined together, and the dotted line above is about 1,140 × 10,000 kW for all products.

If it arrives as the developers plan, FY2030 is still 631 × 10,000 kW and does not reach the middle line. If everything that has got as far as a construction cost contribution contract arrives, the middle line is passed in FY2027. Whichever line is followed, the dotted line above — the vessel as a whole — is not reached even in FY2030.

The seats fill in order. The battery seat (primary offline) this year into next, the openings in primary online (Tohoku and Hokuriku) after that, the combined product beyond. And as written on 47-2, procurement volume is defined to be increased once competition is confirmed. Bidding thickening is itself the condition for the vessel to widen.

6. Seats are tied together across areas

Hokkaido Short 83% Tohoku Short 41% Tokyo Short 20% Chubu Short 38% Hokuriku Short 61% Kansai Short 66% Chugoku Short 82% Shikoku Short 99% Kyushu Short 50% 2027/11 Tohoku–Tokyo 573→1,028 ×10,000kW FY2030 Chubu–Kansai (Sekigahara–Kitaomi) 2030/6 Kanmon 300→600 ×10,000kW FY2027 +30 ×10,000kW to FY2028 FC 300 ×10,000kW Figure 6 Seats tie across areas (batteries-only shortfall, Aug 2026, and link schedule)

The balancing market procures area by area, but where there is room on the interconnector a battery in the neighboring area can clear. A battery in Tohoku can sit in a Tokyo room. The years in which the interconnectors widen are already set.

In 2027/11 Tohoku–Tokyo goes from 573 × 10,000 kW to 1,028 × 10,000 kW (in stages, depending on the state of generation). By FY2028 the frequency converter linking Tokyo and Chubu goes to 300 × 10,000 kW. In June 2030, the Kanmon interconnector goes from 300 × 10,000 kW to 600 × 10,000 kW. In FY2030, a new line between Chubu and Kansai.

The shortfall rates in Figure 6 are for the batteries-only room (primary offline). The LDA batteries concentrated in Tohoku and Hokkaido can reach Tokyo's large room from November 2027. Batteries in Kyushu and Chugoku reach Kansai from June 2030. Which areas are full and which are open gets repainted along this calendar. For secondary ① alone, cross-area procurement starts in FY2027, and when the interconnectors are congested the market splits.

7. On low-voltage batteries

It has been pointed out that low-voltage (under 50 kW) grid-scale batteries are increasing with entry into the balancing market in mind. But the minimum bid unit in the market is 1 MW, and a low-voltage battery can bid only once an aggregator has bundled about 20 of them in the same area. A rise in the number of projects is not in itself a rise in supply capacity.

Summary

Where the price stops is on 47-4.

Reference table

Reference table 1 The primary offline seat and awards (August 2026, MW per 30-minute slot), with supply-side figures by area

AreaSeat (procurement volume)AwardedShortfall rateContract applications, end of March 2026 (10,000 kW)LDA awards (10,000 kW, only what can be read from project names)
Hokkaido17383%22946
Tohoku513046%57778
Tokyo927320%6730
Chubu744639%44117
Hokuriku261063%854
Kansai923166%29213
Chugoku751482%53031
Shikoku10099%420
Kyushu623152%65821
Nationwide49723853%3,527371 (of which 163 unknown)

Source: our calculation from EPRX trading results (2026/8 preliminary), Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (ANRE) Next-Generation Power Grid Working Group, 12th meeting, Document 2, and Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators (OCCTO) Long-term Decarbonization Power Source Auction clearing results, attachments (rounds 1 to 3). LDA areas are aggregated only where they can be read from the project name; the 1,626 MW (44%) that cannot be read is "unknown"

Notes: the figures in Figures 1 to 3 are preliminary through August 2026. The shortfall rate is (procurement volume − awarded volume) ÷ procurement volume, counted area by area and slot by slot and then summed, with slots where the award exceeds the procurement volume treated as zero shortfall (rounding may differ from the nationwide aggregate in COLUMN 16). In Figure 3, "nearly full" is a shortfall rate of 20% or less, "half" is 20–50% and "open" is above 50%. The "volume under a construction cost contribution contract" in Figure 4 is read approximately off the bar chart in Attachment Figure 7-1 of the FY2026 Supply Plan compilation (as of the end of November 2025). The Supply Plan in Figure 5 joins the FY2025, FY2026 and FY2030 values with straight lines.

Sources

Supervised by
Shinya Nakashima, Ph.D. (Eng.) — Representative Director, Science X Inc.

Works on the development, sale and technical due diligence of grid-scale battery storage plants in Japan. This column is written and supervised on the basis of that hands-on transaction and due-diligence practice.

Energy Business Consultation

Project-specific information not covered in our articles
will be disclosed after NDA execution following your inquiry.

Contact Us →