COLUMN 01 — Policy Explained

What is the Long-Duration Decarbonized Power Auction (LDA)?
— A Complete Guide to the 20-Year Fixed Revenue Mechanism

For those considering entry into the battery storage business, this article explains the basic structure of the LDA through the 3rd round policy changes, based on primary sources.

Why the Government Created This System

Japan's power system faces significant challenges as renewable energy expands rapidly. Since solar and wind depend on weather conditions, battery storage systems that balance electricity supply and demand have become essential.

However, large-scale battery storage requires investments exceeding 10 billion yen for construction. For private companies to make such investments, a long-term revenue outlook is essential.

The government created the "Long-Duration Decarbonized Power Auction (LDA)" in FY2023 as part of the capacity market. Managed by OCCTO (Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators), in a nutshell, it is a system where "if you build and operate a battery for 20 years, the government guarantees your construction and fixed costs."

How the LDA Works — "Defensive" and "Offensive" Two-Tier Revenue

When you win the LDA, revenue consists of two tiers. The auction uses a multi-price format (each winner's bid price becomes their contract price), which differs from the Main Auction's single-price format.

(1) Defensive Revenue (Fixed Cost Recovery) = LDA Fixed Income
Funding to cover "fixed costs" such as construction, personnel, and maintenance. Paid at a fixed amount by OCCTO for 20 years. Annual adjustments based on price changes (core CPI) are also applied, providing a degree of inflation hedging.

(2) Offensive Revenue (Market Trading Profits) = Bonus Profit
Profits from the wholesale power market (JEPX), balancing market, non-fossil value market, etc. Since fixed costs are covered by (1), (2) serves as additional upside revenue.

Even in the worst-case scenario (zero market profits), the fixed income from (1) ensures no losses. This stability is the greatest advantage, making project finance structuring easier and favorably influencing lending decisions by financial institutions.

The Truth Behind the "90% Refund Rule" — Actually a Three-Tier Structure

The LDA has an arrangement known as the "90% refund rule," but it is actually a three-tier structure.

Three-Tier Refund Rate Structure

Tier 1 (95% refund rate): Market revenue up to the business profit margin factored into the bid price. Operator retains 5%.

Tier 2 (90% refund rate): Revenue exceeding the profit margin up to the difference between LDA and Main Auction contract prices. Operator retains 10%.

Tier 3 (85% refund rate): Excess profits above the above thresholds. Operator retains 15%.

Source: TMI Associates commentary article https://www.tmi.gr.jp/eyes/blog/2023/15106.html / OCCTO Detailed System Explanation Materials (September 2024)

Importantly, only (2) market trading profits are subject to refunds — 100% of (1) LDA fixed income stays with the operator. KPMG's analysis shows that the LDA IRR converges to approximately 3.2% "bond-like returns" from capacity payments alone, but the 20-year stable revenue makes DSCR (net CF before debt service / debt service) easier to structure, enabling financing through TK-GK schemes via SPCs (Special Purpose Companies).

Eligible Power Sources and Participation Requirements

Only new construction, replacement, and renovation projects are eligible for the LDA. In addition to batteries and pumped hydro, nuclear, hydroelectric, solar, wind, geothermal, dedicated biomass, and hydrogen/ammonia co-firing (renovation) are eligible, with LNG-fired thermal also included as a temporary measure for FY2023-2025.

Key participation requirements for batteries:
- Minimum bid capacity: 30 MW or more (from 2nd round onward)
- Supply capacity start deadline: within 4 years of winning the auction
- Obtaining a grid connection review response is a prerequisite for bidding
Source: OCCTO Detailed System Explanation Materials (September 2024)

Results from the 1st and 2nd Rounds — Capital Rushes into Batteries

Item1st Round (Published Apr 2024)2nd Round (Published Apr 2025)
Decarbonized power solicitation volume4000 MW5000 MW
Battery bid volume4,559MW6,956MW (+53%)
Battery awarded volume1,092MW1,370MW- 27 cases (+25%)
Battery win rateapprox. 24%approx. 20%
Competition ratioApprox. 4.2xApprox. 5.1x
Weighted avg. contract price (all decarbonized)58,000 yen/kW/year68,000 yen/kW/year
Total contract value (all decarbonized)233.6 billion yen/year346.4 billion yen/year
Source: OCCTO contract results (published April 26, 2024 and April 28, 2025) / SOLAR JOURNAL / PVeye

In the 1st round, batteries won 1,092MW plus pumped hydro 577MW for a total of 1,669MW. According to KPMG's analysis, approximately 60% of winning battery companies were foreign-owned, showing international investment capital concentrating on this system.

The 2nd round saw 961MW for 3 to less than 6 hours duration and 409MW for 6+ hours. The largest awarded source was existing nuclear safety investment at 3,153MW (3 projects).

Warning: 20% Win Rate — Winning is Not Guaranteed
In the 2nd round, only 1 in 5 bids succeeded. The biggest differentiator is "obtaining the grid connection review response in advance" and "low interconnection costs." Securing a suitable site is the prerequisite for winning the LDA.

Policy Changes from the 3rd Round — Drastic Reduction in LiB Quota and 6-Hour Requirement

Key changes for the 3rd LDA (FY2025 bidding):

(1) Significant reduction in LiB solicitation quota: Total battery/pumped hydro/LDES solicitation cap of 0.8GW. Of this, LiB + pumped hydro replacement is 0.4GW, non-LiB + new pumped hydro + LDES is 0.4GW. A significant reduction from the effective 1GW quota in the 1st and 2nd rounds.

(2) Increase in required operating duration: 3+ hours → continuous 6+ hours. Reflecting policy emphasis on long-duration response to evening ramp-up.

(3) Restrictions on cell manufacturing country dependency on specific nations

(4) New eligible power sources added: Thermal with CCS, LDES, ammonia-fired
Source: Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, 104th System Review Working Group Materials (June 23, 2025)

Since 3-4 hour LiB batteries will find it difficult to participate in the LDA, it is urgent to consider technologies capable of long-duration discharge (sodium-ion batteries, LDES, etc.).

Summary — For the LDA, "Entry = Securing the Right Site" is Everything

The LDA is an extremely attractive system that stabilizes project revenue with 20-year fixed income. However, there are hurdles: an intensely competitive 20% win rate, a minimum capacity requirement of 30MW, and the prerequisite of obtaining a grid connection review response in advance.

Securing a suitable site with low grid interconnection costs and a system to rapidly obtain grid connection review responses — this is the shortest path to winning the LDA.

Sources & References:
- OCCTO Detailed System Explanation Materials (September 2024) https://www.occto.or.jp/assets/market-board/market/files/20240920_youryou_syousaisetsumei_long.pdf
- OCCTO 2nd LDA Clearing Results (April 28, 2025) https://www.occto.or.jp/market-board/market/oshirase/2025/files/250428_longauction_youryouyakujokekka_kouhyou_ousatsu2024.pdf
- TMI Associates LDA Explanation https://www.tmi.gr.jp/eyes/blog/2023/15106.html
- KPMG Decarbonized Power Auction Analysis https://kpmg.com/jp/ja/home/insights/2024/10/decarbonized-power-auction.html
- Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, 104th System Review Working Group Materials (June 23, 2025)
- SOLAR JOURNAL https://solarjournal.jp/policy/53347/ / PVeye https://www.pveye.jp/eye_sight/view/6279/
- enegaeru.com https://www.enegaeru.com/long-term-decarbonizationpowersourceauction